ORDER BY (the lesser known way)

We all know with MySQL you can use ORDER BY with a list of columns to return an ordered set, e.g. ORDER BY name, type, state;
I often use the syntax ORDER BY 1,2; which I’m surprised that some people do not know about.

However I needed to do some selective ordering of a type field, I didn’t want to for example have a lookup table just to join for ordering. While contemplating a means of achieving this, I asked a work colleague, who I figured may have just experienced this problem before. Lone behold I became the student as I discovered there is a third syntax with ORDER BY, using expressions.

mysql> create table test(name varchar(10) not null, type varchar(10) not null);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)

mysql> insert into test(name,type) values
('Apples','Fruit'),
('Bananas','Fruit'),
('Carrots','Veg'),
('Onions','Veg'),
('Beer','Liquid'),
('Water','Liquid'),
('Crackers','Food');
Query OK, 7 rows affected (0.00 sec)
Records: 7  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

mysql> select name from test
order by type='Veg' DESC,
         type='Fruit' DESC,
         type='Food' DESC,
         type='Liquid' DESC;
+----------+
| name     |
+----------+
| Carrots  |
| Onions   |
| Apples   |
| Bananas  |
| Crackers |
| Beer     |
| Water    |
+----------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Of course, reading the MySQL Manual confirms this on the SELECT command .
I’ve not read the MySQL manual from cover to cover, since 4.x days. Perhaps it’s time.

Thanks to Nick Pisarro of Blog Revolution for this most valuable tip.

Tagged with: Databases MySQL

Related Posts

Readyset QueryPilot Announcement

At the MySQL and Heatwave Summit 2025 today, Readyset announced a new data systems architecture pattern named Readyset QueryPilot . This architecture which can front a MySQL or PostgreSQL database infrastructure, combines the enterprise-grade ProxySQL and Readyset caching with intelligent query monitoring and routing to help support applications scale and produce more predictable results with varied workloads.

Read more

More CPUs or Newer CPUs

In a CPU-bound database workload, regardless of price, would you scale-up or scale-new? What if price was the driving factor, would you scale-up or scale-new? I am using as a baseline the first available AWS Graviton2 processor for RDS (r6g).

Read more

An Interesting Artifact with AWS RDS Aurora Storage

As part of using public datasets with my own Benchmarking Suite I wanted upsize a dataset for larger volume testing. I have always used the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES data_length and index_length columns as a sufficiently accurate measurement for actual disk space used.

Read more