A simple FAILED SQL statement breaks MySQL 5.6 replication

I setup 6 shiny new MySQL 5.6.13 MySQL servers, ready for testing and production deployment tomorrow.

I found that the New Relic MySQL Monitoring was throwing the following error.

[2013-08-08 03:53:33 +0000] com.newrelic.plugins.mysql.MySQL | SEVERE | An SQL error occured running 'SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS' Access denied; you need (at least one of) the PROCESS privilege(s) for this operation

Simple fix, the user I am gathering metrics requires the PROCESS privilege. Again simple enough.

mysql> grant PROCESS on xxx.* to xxx@'10.%';
ERROR 1221 (HY000): Incorrect usage of DB GRANT and GLOBAL PRIVILEGES
mysql> grant PROCESS on *.* to xxx@'10.%';
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

As you can see I got an error for a global privilege, again trivial, easy fix to correct syntax. However, it breaks replication with a very non descriptive message.

mysql> SHOW SLAVE STATUSG
...
Last_Errno: 1590
Last_Error: The incident LOST_EVENTS occured on the master. Message: error writing to the binary log
...

Bug #68892 reported this in April, verified by Oracle support, but is listed as ‘non-critical’. I agree with the bug author, given MySQL 5.6 touts many MySQL replication improvements, a simple failed statement should not break replication.

Tagged with: Databases MySQL

Related Posts

My take on PyCon Australia 2026

PyCon AU 2026 held in Brisbane this week was a five day event for the Python community. With specialized tracks and dedicated tutorial and engineering days there was a wide variety of content available.

Read more

Fixing Old Software Bugs Without Thinking

I previously came across an issue in my benchmarking work where I relied on the Latency Histogram section of sysbench output. On Linux it worked fine — I generally ran my workload there, so it never mattered.

Read more

Curating DuckDB Datasets Leveraging AI

In Curated MySQL Data Sets for Realistic Testing I described datasets assembled the manual way — download, schema, load, validate, document — over hours or days per source. This post is the follow-up I promised: what changes when AI assists the same workflow, using DuckDB as the target engine and GeoNames as the first example.

Read more