Options using MySQL Pairs

Configuring a production environment using a pair of MySQL servers in a Master/Fail Over Master situation is a common process to provide many benefits including supporting failover, backup/recovery, higher availability for software & database upgrades. This is also a common method for database shards. One of the key hidden benefits is by performing regular controlled failovers for example with software upgrades you are actively testing your disaster recovery procedures. Most organizations have a partial plan, some don’t have any, but rarely do people test their disaster recovery.

There is no one way to configure and manage such an environment. There are a number of options including:

  • Develop your own home grown scripts
  • Flipper by Proven Scaling
  • MMM by Percona
  • Heatbeat by the Linux High Availability Project

I have started a detailed review of a number of these technologies and will be providing my findings for review.

This is not the only way to solve the problems of course. Google for example have provided MySQL Patches that include features such as semi-sync replication and mirrored binary logs. Red Hat Cluster suite, and MySQL/DRBD are other technologies but less idea for various reasons specifically the “cold” nature of the failover environment.

Tagged with: Databases MySQL

Related Posts

MySQL and Heatwave Summit Presentation

Last week I had the opportunity to speak at the MySQL and Heatwave Summit in San Francisco. I discussed the impact of the new MySQL 8.0 default caching_sha2_password authentication, replacing the mysql_native_password authentication that was the default for approximately 20 of the 30 years that MySQL has existed.

Read more

Readyset QueryPilot Announcement

At the MySQL and Heatwave Summit 2025 today, Readyset announced a new data systems architecture pattern named Readyset QueryPilot . This architecture which can front a MySQL or PostgreSQL database infrastructure, combines the enterprise-grade ProxySQL and Readyset caching with intelligent query monitoring and routing to help support applications scale and produce more predictable results with varied workloads.

Read more

More CPUs or Newer CPUs

In a CPU-bound database workload, regardless of price, would you scale-up or scale-new? What if price was the driving factor, would you scale-up or scale-new? I am using as a baseline the first available AWS Graviton2 processor for RDS (r6g).

Read more