<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is max_tmp_tables?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/what-is-max_tmp_tables-2009-06-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/what-is-max_tmp_tables-2009-06-16/</link>
	<description>Expert times and information on MySQL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:45:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheeri</title>
		<link>http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/what-is-max_tmp_tables-2009-06-16/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/?p=1645#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Paul is spot on (although see my latest post at &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.pythian.com/news/2963/trivial-mysql-variable-of-the-day&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pythian.com/news/2963/trivial-mysql-variable-of-the-day&lt;/a&gt;, old_alter_table is not actually documented, and it&#039;s unclear whether or not changing the value does anything).  I&#039;ll add that the word &quot;yet&quot; speaks to whether or not it did something before -- it did not -- currently it doesn&#039;t do anything &quot;yet&quot;, which to me means it never has done anything.

I&#039;ve been combing the status variables recently (hence my posts; I did one last week on the silliness that is the &quot;old&quot; and &quot;new&quot; variables) and &quot;this variable is unused&quot; shows up in the docs in some places.  So to find the variables that don&#039;t do anything, I used the search box on dev.mysql.com to search for &quot;is unused&quot; (and &quot;do anything&quot;) in the MySQL Reference v5.1 docs only, clicked on &quot;repeat the seach with the omitted results included&quot;, and found that I got many of the &quot;options manual pages&quot; and variables....

From http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-options.html
--log-tc
--tc-heuristic-recover

From http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-status-variables.html
Tc_log_max_pages_used
Tc_log_page_size

From http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/privileges-provided.html
the REFERENCES privilege

From http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-options-slave.html
rpl_recovery_rank

From http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-system-variables.html
date_format
datetime_format
table_lock_wait_timeout
time_format

And a bunch in the API:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysql-options.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-options-slave.html#sysvar_slave_exec_mode

I&#039;ll note for Paul -- max_tmp_tables is the only variable/option that uses the phrasing &quot;does not yet do anything&quot; instead of &quot;is unused&quot;.  Perhaps that should be fixed, for easier searching?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul is spot on (although see my latest post at <a HREF="http://www.pythian.com/news/2963/trivial-mysql-variable-of-the-day" rel="nofollow">http://www.pythian.com/news/2963/trivial-mysql-variable-of-the-day</a>, old_alter_table is not actually documented, and it&#8217;s unclear whether or not changing the value does anything).  I&#8217;ll add that the word &#8220;yet&#8221; speaks to whether or not it did something before &#8212; it did not &#8212; currently it doesn&#8217;t do anything &#8220;yet&#8221;, which to me means it never has done anything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been combing the status variables recently (hence my posts; I did one last week on the silliness that is the &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;new&#8221; variables) and &#8220;this variable is unused&#8221; shows up in the docs in some places.  So to find the variables that don&#8217;t do anything, I used the search box on dev.mysql.com to search for &#8220;is unused&#8221; (and &#8220;do anything&#8221;) in the MySQL Reference v5.1 docs only, clicked on &#8220;repeat the seach with the omitted results included&#8221;, and found that I got many of the &#8220;options manual pages&#8221; and variables&#8230;.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-options.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-options.html</a><br />
&#8211;log-tc<br />
&#8211;tc-heuristic-recover</p>
<p>From <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-status-variables.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-status-variables.html</a><br />
Tc_log_max_pages_used<br />
Tc_log_page_size</p>
<p>From <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/privileges-provided.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/privileges-provided.html</a><br />
the REFERENCES privilege</p>
<p>From <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-options-slave.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-options-slave.html</a><br />
rpl_recovery_rank</p>
<p>From <a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-system-variables.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/server-system-variables.html</a><br />
date_format<br />
datetime_format<br />
table_lock_wait_timeout<br />
time_format</p>
<p>And a bunch in the API:<br />
<a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysql-options.html" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysql-options.html</a><br />
<a href="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-options-slave.html#sysvar_slave_exec_mode" rel="nofollow">http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-options-slave.html#sysvar_slave_exec_mode</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll note for Paul &#8212; max_tmp_tables is the only variable/option that uses the phrasing &#8220;does not yet do anything&#8221; instead of &#8220;is unused&#8221;.  Perhaps that should be fixed, for easier searching?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul DuBois</title>
		<link>http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/what-is-max_tmp_tables-2009-06-16/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul DuBois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ronaldbradford.com/blog/?p=1645#comment-574</guid>
		<description>&quot;If this option doesn’t yet do anything, why is it there?&quot;

Because it&#039;s visible in the server (e.g., with SHOW VARIABLES). If it weren&#039;t documented, people would ask &quot;why is it not listed in the manual?&quot;

&quot;Does it actually do something and the documentation is misrepresenting the option?&quot;

No.

&quot;Did it provide some feature or functionality before?&quot;

Not that I know of. Perhaps it was originally added in anticipation of adding a feature that ended up not being developed. That&#039;s only speculation on my part, though.

&quot;The latest is max_tmp_tables.&quot;

It was added in 3.23.0, and it&#039;s been in the manual as described for quite a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If this option doesn’t yet do anything, why is it there?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s visible in the server (e.g., with SHOW VARIABLES). If it weren&#8217;t documented, people would ask &#8220;why is it not listed in the manual?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Does it actually do something and the documentation is misrepresenting the option?&#8221;</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>&#8220;Did it provide some feature or functionality before?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not that I know of. Perhaps it was originally added in anticipation of adding a feature that ended up not being developed. That&#8217;s only speculation on my part, though.</p>
<p>&#8220;The latest is max_tmp_tables.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was added in 3.23.0, and it&#8217;s been in the manual as described for quite a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
